Posts Tagged ‘Society’

Starting An Internet Business: Understanding Common Legal Questions

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008


Starting an internet business is much easier now than it was ten years ago. Now it is possible to use open source software, outsource software development overseas, have your website hosted in the cloud, and register a domain for $10. However, there is also more to consider when you’re starting an internet business. Here are answers to many of the most frequently asked legal questions by entrepreneurs getting started online.

Does My Designer Or Agency Own My Website?

When you pay to have your website designed you should double-check with your agency whether or not you will own copyright to the work. This should be outlined in your contract. If you do not discuss this with your designer they are unlikely to claim that they own copyright at a later stage, but they would certainly be entitled to. In the UK the creator of the copyright will own all of the work unless it was completed as a result of a work-for-hire agreement, or you have a contract with the designer that says otherwise. The same also applies if you use the services of a software developer, a writer, or even, potentially, a translator.

In this instance where you may have a dispute with your designer, it’s best that they don’t have the ability to take down your website. That’s why you should control access to where the domain name points and you should also make sure they are not given unregulated access to the server once things are up and running. Try not to become too reliant on one supplier – it’s an easy mistake to make. You are probably best to use a separate provider for domain names, hosting and web design.

What Legal Entity Is Best For Me?

When you’re starting an internet business you’ll be able to decide between starting a limited company and starting out as a sole trader. If you are going into business with a partner, you will have to become a partnership rather than a sole trader. As a partnership or a sole trader you will not have to submit paperwork to Companies House, however you will have full liability for anything that goes on with the business. As a limited company you will have more reporting requirements; however you will not be liable should your business get into debt. In the long run, should your internet business be successful, you will most likely have to incorporate your business and become a limited company.

How Do I Make UK Law Apply In All Of My Contracts?

It is most likely the case that you would like UK law to apply to all transactions, and for any court proceedings to take place in the UK. That’s why you have customers accept terms and conditions, and you should also have terms of use and a privacy policy which say the same thing. It’s important to mention that UK law will be used, and that any legal proceedings will take place in the English courts. It’s possible for UK law to be judged in an international court, or for an international law to be judged in the UK. This is particularly relevant for an internet business.

Intellectual property : Bob Schuster, from Jacksonville, WY, USA, specializes in everything from commercial litigation to intellectual property infringement, brain injury and carbon monoxide poisoning. Visit BobSchuster.com today for more information.

Toronto Lawyer : Kostman & Pyzer is a criminal defence law firm serving clients in the Greater Toronto area and elsewhere in the province of Ontario since 1983. Our goal is a successful conclusion to every case. We understand that a criminal accusation can often be an overwhelming experience for the defendant, with significant social, psychological and economic ramifications. Visit us online today.

Law and Legal

Advokat Claims Breach Of Privacy In Bath University Lawsuits

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008

Bath University finds itself defending claims by an advokat and law firms who claim the school breached the privacy of individuals and disregarded the rights of consumers and the general public. This story started innocently enough, with Bath University allowing a research project, called Cityware. In the first stages of this project, the researchers had scanners installed at specific places around the city, and these scanners were intended to pick up and monitor Bluetooth devices which emit radio signals. Bluetooth allows communication between devices for a short distance. Ten thousand people unknowingly had their data collected and stored in a central research database with the use of these scanners. The advokat claims that the privacy of the citizens of the city was breached, and that the university acted covertly and with a blatant disregard for the rights of consumers and citizens. The director of the group Privacy International, Simon Davies, says that individuals can be identified by their Bluetooth signals.

An advokat for consumers, and one who usually handles liability lawsuits, says that the university secretly and covertly monitored the movements of citizens without their consent or knowledge, using the signals that are emitted by their laptop computers and cell phones. The head of the project, Eamonn O’Neill, who is also the director of the postgraduate research studies in the computer science department at Bath University, did not take the criticism from law firms, the advokat, and citizens quietly. He defended the Cityware project, stating the importance of the research as an excuse for the methods, and also predicting that in time this research may help determine ways to monitor prisoners and criminals. Advokater and lawyers point out however that the ends in this case do not justify secretly monitoring citizens without their informed consent. In a statement Dr. O’Neill stated that the research data was securely stored, and that to determine the actual identity of the device owner would require a substantial amount of cross referencing. As one advokat pondered, though, who knows what is possible once the data has been compiled. The fact that citizens were secretly monitored without consent goes against the basic principal of scientific research, which required informed consent from any research participant, and in this case that was not done, opening up Bath University and the project participants to a host of liability and breach of privacy lawsuits by an advokat representing citizens who were monitored.